Business and creative people go together as well as fine wine at a burger joint. Riding on the heels of the monumentally profitable “The Hangover,” in “The Hangover Part II” the brass win out over the artists.
Sequels usually fail because they’re just subpar compared to their initial flash of genius. On the surface, “The Hangover Part II” appears to take chances by radically upping the ante on the film’s shock factor. But delving beneath the smoke and mirrors, the film actually is trying desperately not to let you down by riling you up even more.
Part two puts a new meaning to “Bangcock” when the film’s bachelor finds a woman who, if she was a Ms. Potato Head, was misassembled with one body part that makes you go hmmmm. Successful comedy, though, doesn’t come from having to drop more “F” bombs or falling down more stairs. Just ask Bill Cosby. That man could make the vanilla subject of his family funny.
Instead, “The Hangover Part II” falls victim to a pure numbers game. Two years ago, the surprise hit “The Hangover” unpredictably grossed a whopping $467 million globally on a budget of $35 billion. As sequels almost always get a larger budget the second time around after their first was highly profitable, “The Hangover Part II” more than doubled the budget to $80 million.
And with more than twice as much money to work with, the stakes are even higher this time around to dish out another cash cow. That’s why the creative team behind “The Hangover Part II” was only allowed to write the same kind of material within the same exact formula as the first film because Warner Bros. knows that equation works. In the sequel, they figured it’d be too risky to upset the applecart with a bold new direction.
This formula worked so well the first time because we were surprised with it. This time, we’ve seen it before and it’s less effective. Bradley Cooper, Zach Galifianakis, Ed Helms and Ken Jeong return with pretty much the same exact film but in a different country, with someone different to marry and a monkey that’s cute as hell instead of a baby. Elements such as the all-too-familiar elevator scene and the same cell phone picture wrap-up are the double-edged sword of disappointing and enjoyable once more.
“The Hangover Part II” starts right after the Las Vegas bachelor party from the first film. This time around, Phil, Stu, Alan and Doug whisk themselves off to Thailand for Stu’s wedding. Stu jokes about wanting to have his bachelor party at IHOP, but the Bradley Cooper refuses to let his buddy get off that easy. Plus, there wouldn’t be another movie unless Stu’s subsequent plan for a subdued pre-wedding brunch goes atomically awry.
Of course, a comedy’s No. 1 mission is to entertainingly make you laugh. Just as the first film scores 8 out of 10 points on the funny farm, the sequel does again. And if you’re willing to accept that part two is the same exact film just with the difference of a “two” in the title and a new girl to marry in a new, far-off land, then you’ll even find yourself enjoying the over-the-top shock factor, too.
While Ed Helms and Bradley Cooper continue to consume too much screen time but do help to create a strong comedic ensemble, thankfully the creepy, awkward and just-funny-to-look-at Zach Galifianakis again serves as the film’s leading comic relief. Without Galifianakis in this Jack Black-like role, these films would be devoid like a skeleton without any of its bones.
Also, supporter Ken Jeong returns in another enjoyable performance. He’s one of the few actors who can make discussing himself in the first person seem cool. Finally, rather than using a baby in the first film to capture your oooohs and awwwws, this one pleasantly stars a smoking monkey. If you’re watching nothing else, just studying his fascinating and intricate facial expressions is worth six of your 10 bucks alone.
That said, there’s a disappointing cameo use of “A”-lister Paul Giamatti. While enjoyable in a brief restaurant scene, his talent is underutilized. He should have either been more funny or more badass. Instead, he’s just a little bit of both for too short of a time. Come on, Paul. We’ve seen you tote a gun better than this. Remember “Shoot ‘Em Up”?
And while Mike Tyson’s return cameo was clearly meant to be funny, instead he offers one of the worst and most unfunny song and dance we’ve seen on screen in recent years. Newcomer Mason Lee experiences an unrealistic character evolution from his initial understanding as an Ivy League-caliber beacon of light to a raucous, “I lost my finger but it’s cool” party freak.
I have very high standards for on-screen chemical romance. If you’re going to make two people fall in fantasy love, we’d better be able to buy into it. I’ve been trashing on-screen chemistry a lot lately because most attempts at Hollywood love stories have recently failed miserably. Ed Helms with wife Jamie Chung couldn’t be more wrong for each other. It’s the film’s most humdrum joke that wasn’t meant to be comical.
Sequels usually fail because they’re just subpar compared to their initial flash of genius. On the surface, “The Hangover Part II” appears to take chances by radically upping the ante on the film’s shock factor. But delving beneath the smoke and mirrors, the film actually is trying desperately not to let you down by riling you up even more.
Part two puts a new meaning to “Bangcock” when the film’s bachelor finds a woman who, if she was a Ms. Potato Head, was misassembled with one body part that makes you go hmmmm. Successful comedy, though, doesn’t come from having to drop more “F” bombs or falling down more stairs. Just ask Bill Cosby. That man could make the vanilla subject of his family funny.
Instead, “The Hangover Part II” falls victim to a pure numbers game. Two years ago, the surprise hit “The Hangover” unpredictably grossed a whopping $467 million globally on a budget of $35 billion. As sequels almost always get a larger budget the second time around after their first was highly profitable, “The Hangover Part II” more than doubled the budget to $80 million.
And with more than twice as much money to work with, the stakes are even higher this time around to dish out another cash cow. That’s why the creative team behind “The Hangover Part II” was only allowed to write the same kind of material within the same exact formula as the first film because Warner Bros. knows that equation works. In the sequel, they figured it’d be too risky to upset the applecart with a bold new direction.
This formula worked so well the first time because we were surprised with it. This time, we’ve seen it before and it’s less effective. Bradley Cooper, Zach Galifianakis, Ed Helms and Ken Jeong return with pretty much the same exact film but in a different country, with someone different to marry and a monkey that’s cute as hell instead of a baby. Elements such as the all-too-familiar elevator scene and the same cell phone picture wrap-up are the double-edged sword of disappointing and enjoyable once more.
“The Hangover Part II” starts right after the Las Vegas bachelor party from the first film. This time around, Phil, Stu, Alan and Doug whisk themselves off to Thailand for Stu’s wedding. Stu jokes about wanting to have his bachelor party at IHOP, but the Bradley Cooper refuses to let his buddy get off that easy. Plus, there wouldn’t be another movie unless Stu’s subsequent plan for a subdued pre-wedding brunch goes atomically awry.
Of course, a comedy’s No. 1 mission is to entertainingly make you laugh. Just as the first film scores 8 out of 10 points on the funny farm, the sequel does again. And if you’re willing to accept that part two is the same exact film just with the difference of a “two” in the title and a new girl to marry in a new, far-off land, then you’ll even find yourself enjoying the over-the-top shock factor, too.
While Ed Helms and Bradley Cooper continue to consume too much screen time but do help to create a strong comedic ensemble, thankfully the creepy, awkward and just-funny-to-look-at Zach Galifianakis again serves as the film’s leading comic relief. Without Galifianakis in this Jack Black-like role, these films would be devoid like a skeleton without any of its bones.
Also, supporter Ken Jeong returns in another enjoyable performance. He’s one of the few actors who can make discussing himself in the first person seem cool. Finally, rather than using a baby in the first film to capture your oooohs and awwwws, this one pleasantly stars a smoking monkey. If you’re watching nothing else, just studying his fascinating and intricate facial expressions is worth six of your 10 bucks alone.
That said, there’s a disappointing cameo use of “A”-lister Paul Giamatti. While enjoyable in a brief restaurant scene, his talent is underutilized. He should have either been more funny or more badass. Instead, he’s just a little bit of both for too short of a time. Come on, Paul. We’ve seen you tote a gun better than this. Remember “Shoot ‘Em Up”?
And while Mike Tyson’s return cameo was clearly meant to be funny, instead he offers one of the worst and most unfunny song and dance we’ve seen on screen in recent years. Newcomer Mason Lee experiences an unrealistic character evolution from his initial understanding as an Ivy League-caliber beacon of light to a raucous, “I lost my finger but it’s cool” party freak.
I have very high standards for on-screen chemical romance. If you’re going to make two people fall in fantasy love, we’d better be able to buy into it. I’ve been trashing on-screen chemistry a lot lately because most attempts at Hollywood love stories have recently failed miserably. Ed Helms with wife Jamie Chung couldn’t be more wrong for each other. It’s the film’s most humdrum joke that wasn’t meant to be comical.
No comments:
Post a Comment